Tuesday, July 24, 2012

A500.9.4.RB_LarsonKurt, Blog-Course Reflections

A500.9.4.RB_LarsonKurt, Blog-Course Reflections
This is a bit of a rehash from A500.9.2.DQ, however, With regard to the discussion topic and how it relates from the perception of a learner. One must first realize that most of us in a higher educational environment have for the most part, embarked upon a life of learning and understanding. That is not to say that those not in our category are not learning or seeking to understand themselves, we are simply accomplishing it in a more formal setting.
That said and considering the required reading in  A500.9.1.CR, particularly what was discussed in the purposes of ePortfollios serving four major purposes: to facilitate reflection on learning in a course, to showcase career skills, to aid in program review and assessment and to showcase professional standards. I believe can also be equated to how a student(s) track and chart their own educational destiny.
As example, I began my graduate work in the Project Management arena, only to reevaluate my goals and objectives after four classes in a path I was not willing to continue to follow. This caused me to change to MSLD which is more in-tune with desired career paths.
I believe that the last two course specific classes MSLD 500 and 520 have given me some specific tools to assess not only my educational goals, but my career goals as well. Plus the insight necessary to tailor my skills and education around those career specific goals vs. simply fulfills the requirements of a course or degree work and calling it good-to-go and then putting those skills into practicality.
From the aspect of a course reflection, I still have not understood how the concept mapping is of value? In my opinion, I believe the parent/child relationship with regard to a learning environment is outdated and there are ample other avenues in-use today that can fulfill the needs of group interaction… Blackboard comes to mind.
The courses with-out mid and final exams are a welcome diversion from the typical undergrad and grad courses I am accustomed to. I believe the research, interaction, DQ and Web Log interaction and involvement is sufficient to learn and in-turn reaffirm to the instructor and ERAU that we as students have both an academic and practice grasp of the curriculum.          

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

A500.8.3.RB_LarsonKurt, Blog-Good Presentation Design


A500.8.3.RB_LarsonKurt, Blog-Good Presentation Design

Like I discussed in A500.8.2.DQ, I do not agree that most business presentations are terrible. One must take into account the audience one must present to and putting the responsibility of knowing ones audience upon the presenter.

The example I used for the DQ discussed a particular presentation to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB,) in Washington, DC. The topic Public Aircraft Safety being high on their radar, I along with a host of others presented in a formal setting knowing we had exactly 10 minutes to present our salient points. And with the typical Green, Yellow and Red lights in front of us as a constant reminder to stay on point and on topic. My point, simply that individual’s high on the food, chain do not want to be entertained… they want to be informed. 
That said… the essential elements of a good presentation should be Simple, clear, concise and too the point. And have the ability to address to the audience what exactly your message is and allow some time to be interpersonal with your audience (if and when permissible,) this would be an opportune time to utilize the “B” key as a way of taking the audiences attention off the silver screen and squarely on you.

Creating a presentation should be undertook with the end in mind, this way you will have a method of navigating to your final destination… and your audience will as well. Knowing your audience and remembering that most CEO’s, General’s and Admiral’s have staff to get into the detailed portion of your topic after the brief is complete. So keep it on point and with a level of difficulty and technicality that is commiserate with your audience. And when presenting to multiple audiences in might be a good idea to have a variant of your presentation adaptable to the differing audiences.

Do not allow the presentation to do your presenting for you, rather you present to your audience and use which ever video and audio methods you choose to back-up and accent your presentation.

Knowing your topic backwards and forwards also might also be a good idea, if you wish for your topic and yourself to maintain credibility. Also should you stumble and forget your place or a particular train of thought, simply move on. Your audience will not know the difference unless you constantly use the “ah” word as you search for something to say. If you get lost… take a moment to regroup and continue like nothing has happened. You may remember what you forgot earlier and find a way to insert it into your presentation without anybody the wiser, or use it as reinforcing point at the end of your presentation… if applicable.
And lastly, do not make excuses for yourself in advance, if you are sick or have a sore throat, the audience will see it and respect you for sticking with-it.    

Tuesday, July 10, 2012

A500.7.3.RB_LarsonKurt, Quantitative Research Reflection


A500.7.3.RB_LarsonKurt, Quantitative Research Reflection

Quantitative methods may be used in acquiring new perspectives of topics about which much is already known, or, as a means toward gaining a more in-depth informative position, which may be difficult to convey qualitatively?

Quantitative research is aimed at answering primarily why and is complimentary not contradictory, however, both Quantitative and qualitative research can be used in the description of the science of social reality.

Quantitative research like any research can have its issues and inherent conditions to be considered prior to commencing a research project.

Strengths
·         Enables the research and description of social structures and processes that are not directly observable
·        Well-suited for quantitative description, comparisons between groups, areas etc.
·        Description of change
·        Analysis and explanation of (causal) dependencies between social phenomena
Weaknesses
·        Simplifies and ”compresses” the complex reality: abstract and constrained perspective
·        Only applicable for measurable (quantifiable) phenomena
·        Presumes relatively extensive knowledge on the subject matter in order to be able to ask ”correct” questions
·        Difficult to study processes or ”dynamic” phenomena: produces static view of the reality
·        Description of actors’ perspectives, intentions and meanings difficult
Also the objectives or what is to be expected, or gained from a particular research project should be understood.

Understanding the logic of basic quantitative principles research, the idea of inferential statistics as a manner from which type of sample methods, frequency and collection methods used are to be considered. Also how the samples are to be analyzed, the data variables with relation to two or more relationships and how they are to be addresses are considerations the experienced researcher should consider… as well as the researchers own reputation and subjectivity should also be considered. In other words, all the collected data would not be worth a plugged nickel if the researcher and collection methods were in question.
    
Other items considered when research planning might include:
Planning the research and selection of the theme or topic, items of personal interest or social significance. Does the topic have the ability to be effectively researched and to whose interest is the research conducted?

Is there data on previous research available to avoid reinventing the wheel or as a jumping off point to continue on with inconclusive or incomplete research?

Research design is another undertaking to assure the validity of the data collected and processed. Good design is a preventer of manipulative data usage through the use of alternative explanations and variables, by allowing effective comparisons and sound judgments. The latter is a preemptive measure toward avoidance of empirical support for a hypothesis through manipulative data.

Some examples of a research design might include the following:

A logically structured research data via structured data including a general description, comparison, classification and explanation of the elements of research design, along with other methods like:


·       Time dimension
·       The number of measurements
·        Interventions
·        Target population and units of research items
·       Generalizations (as needed)
·       Data collection methods (and methods of securing the data)
·       Comparison of data to support contradictory and hypotheses

And finally, are the data collected in an ethical and logical manner with the following priorities?


      Participants were in no way harmed during the data collection or process
·        Participants gave an informed consent (remembering minors)
·       There was participant anonymity
·       The researchers instilled confidence into the participants

Conclusion:

This article has addressed some of the salient points of data collection. Much like anything else we as a society accomplish, if it is not done in a prescribed manner free of scrutiny and above reproach, it will loose perceived any value and usefulness.
In other words, if we as researches do not accomplish our data collection, analysis and research by removing the appearance of impropriety or questionable tactics, our efforts would be in vane as the data and conclusion are not irrefutable.   

Wednesday, July 4, 2012

A500.6.3.RB_LarsonKurt, Qualitative Research


A500.6.3.RB_LarsonKurt, Qualitative Research
Qualitative methodologies can be powerful tools utilized toward our understanding of the educational process that is increasingly gaining momentum.
Researchers that have been instructed in the proper use of quantitative designs tend to face challenges when requested to use or teach qualitative research, and there has been a growing body of laterally professionals who have devoted themselves to qualitative research in education.

Defined qualitative research means, research that produces findings not normally acquired through the primary means of statistical process or quantification and qualitative analysis resulting in a differing degree of knowledge.

Qualitative research and analysis are collocated toward the fictive end of the continuum and without being fictional, statistical research and analysis are not able to take full advantage of interaction and its effects in social settings.

Qualitative research is accepting of complexities and dynamics in the social world, including hosting several paradigms of primary methods of judging methodological quality. This allows for what has come to be known as "situational responsiveness" which is basically an adherence to one paradigm over another. There are various researchers that refer to qualitative and quantitative research that may be effectively comingled into the same research project. It has been said qualitative methods are utilized as a means toward a better understanding of a phenomenon about which yet little is known.

Quantitative methods may be used in acquiring new perspectives of topics about which much is already known, or, as a means toward gaining a more in-depth informative position, which may be difficult to convey quantitatively?

Qualitative research are methods which are appropriate to situations in-which the first order of business are to identify the variables to be be tested quantitatively and at a point in time have been determined quantitative measures do not adequately describe or interpret a situation.

Qualitative data and its ability to fully describe an important situation from both the researcher and reader's perspective, in other words… “If you want people to understand better than they otherwise might, provide them information in the form in which they usually experience it.”

The following list is representative of qualitative research:

1. Qualitative research uses the natural setting as the source of data.
2. The researcher acts as the "human instrument" of data collection.
3. Qualitative researchers predominantly use inductive data analysis.
4. Qualitative research reports are descriptive, incorporating expressive language.
5. Qualitative research has an interpretive character.
6. Qualitative researchers pay attention to idiosyncratic and pervasive uniqueness.
7. Qualitative research is an emergent design; focus on emerging process and outcomes.
8. Qualitative research is judged using special criteria for trustworthiness.

The Role of the Researcher in Qualitative Inquiry:

Qualitative research needs to specify primary questions and strategies for data collection prior to commencing a study; a researcher must do three things:

1. Adoption of a position suggesting the characteristics of a naturalist paradigm.
2. Develop the necessary level of skill for the appropriate study or method data will be     collected and analyzed.
3. Preparation of a research methodology with accepted practices for a naturalistic inquiry.

The above-mentioned items are crucial in maintaining the credibility of a qualitative research report. The confidence that readers have in the researcher's ability toward complete, concise and accurate data and making appropriate decisions in the field will mark the success or failure of a research project.

Research Design and Data Collection Strategies:

For qualitative research to be accurate, there must be a fairly detailed outline from which the study should be conducted and should include the following general steps:

1. Determine a focus for the inquiry and establish a boundary for the study, plus providing inclusion/exclusion criteria for new information.
2. Determine the fitness of the research paradigm to the research focus. The characteristics of the qualitative paradigm with the goals of the research project should be considered.
3. Determine when and where and who will collect the data.
4. Determine milestones of the inquiry.
5. Determine if any additional research instrumentation may be used, or is appropriate.
6. Plan data collection and recording parameters.
7. Plan which data analysis procedures will be used and any acceptable variables are considered appropriate.
8. Plan the logistics of data collection, including scheduling, budgeting and unexpected conditions.
9. Plan the methodology that will be used in the validity process.
In qualitative research researchers should validate a relationship and then test the hypnosis. The naturalistic researcher will assume there is a multitude of realities and attempts toward annotation of the multiple realities adequately. Credibility becomes the litmus test for this since credibility is less dependent upon sample size but rather the content of data gathered and the analytical abilities of the researcher to interpret.

Discussion and Conclusion:

Qualitative research has gained a momentum and increased interest in recent years with a newfound and basic understanding of the paradigm of the technology and education researchers need to complete this research methodology accurately, completely and concisely.

Reference: Hoepfl, M. (1997). Choosing qualitative research: A primer for technology education researchers. Journal of Technology Education, 9(1),