Friday, February 14, 2014

A632.5.5.RB_LarsonKurt, Protected Values in Decision Making

Reflect on the concept map that you created in the previous exercise and consider the Dan Gilbert video from module one. Discuss your protected values and how far you are willing to go to support those values. Explore the level of protection associated with each of your major values identified in the concept map and detail your thoughts on each. Finally, discuss how those protected values would influence your decision-making.

Todays complex web of decisions and decision-making processes can be further skewed through thoughts of grandeur, greed, getting ahead at any and all costs including the slippery slope and often rhetoric or ethical values that can appear from the onset as noble and/or honorable, however, once the dust has settled and the newness of an action, joint venture or proposal we might simply have buyers remorse.

Early realization that in all factions of a work/life scenario, the better the decisions one makes in the present, the better strategically those decisions can be utilized on the future, in other words one must be fully cognizant of decisions created today out of haste or emotion can certainly become an impediment or haunt in the future (Hoch, (2001).

My concept map is outlined with the three attributes that are important to my well-being and have served me well in the success of my business and personal life. They have never been open for interpretation, adjustments or negotiation. One could  (and probably should) surmise that I am rigid in my convictions and I am quite certain that those same convictions have caused me promotions in both my military and civilian career, and have been determining factors in past relationships. I am of the “Whole Man” concept, whereby my actions, commitments and outcomes are for the most part are of a predetermined destiny based my belief in the following:

Strong moral compass: I am the strong leader who sticks by individuals first and foremost, knows the correct path to travel even if not the popular one, sleep well at night knowing the correct and prudent thing was accomplished.

Something that is not advertised in todays working environment, is that leaders and managers are a support system for those with whom they manage. A leader should always set the bar having an innate responsibility to support those with whom they lead… first and foremost.

Integrity above all: Dependability to those that surround me, creditability in my actions and words, honesty in work/life actions.

Kind of a non-brainer, one should always reflect upon ones action as to how the would look on the front page of the Wall Street Journal. If a decision, action, or consequence can pass that litmus test, you should be golden.

Being prepared: Preparation for civil unrest and tyranny in government, being mentally awake, morally straight and physically capable, Preparation for retirement.

This equates to never having to rely on something that may never come. In other words, why place ones’ well-being, success or security of ones family on a policy or program that is based upon risk. Reliance and responsibility for ones actions and outcomes are what make strong and independent individuals who have the intestinal fortitude to get going when the going gets tough.

These protected values have a direct influence upon my decision making process in my work/life relationships and decisions. The decisions I make today do have a direct and coloration effect upon my future and its positive outcome. My parental influence, scouting, religious beliefs, masonic affiliation and military service have all had a direct and positive effect for me to stand my ground, even if it was the unpopular thing, and has gained me the respect of my friends and enemies alike.  

References

Gilbert, D. (Performer). (2005, July) Why we make bad decisions [Web Video]. Retrieved from www.TED.com


Hoch, S., Kunreuther, H., & Gunther, R. (2001). Wharton on Making decisionsdoi:www.wiley.com

No comments:

Post a Comment