Thursday, January 30, 2014

A632.3.4.RB_LarsonKurt, Reflections on Decision Making

Shoemaker and Russo discuss the hazards associated with "frame blindness" and how to guard against it.  Discuss three ways you can avoid "framing traps" and provide a detailed example of each from your life experience.  

Could you have framed each situation differently? What did the exercise teach you about complex decision-making? What additional tools or "frames" would've helped you through the process? How much "risk" do you feel was in your recommendation? What did you learn about yourself through this exercise? 

Frame blindness according to Shoemaker and Russo that simply being unaware of our frames can be an enormous risk. Furthermore as stated in Hoch (2001,) it is managers who run the greatest risk of viewing things via only one mental window often failing to see the views that can be seen if looking out other windows at their disposal. In my opinion this equates to basically having blinders on such as a horse might wear during a race to keep it focused on the task at hand and not be distracted by outside influences. This condition would be detrimental to a manager, or anybody who must see and act from differing perspectives.

Frame blindness in my opinion and experience can be avoided through several methods. I will discuss three:

Avoid the trappings of “my way or the high way”. Individuals who are accustomed to this manner of thinking and leadership can be summed-up as suffering from a Neapolitan complex, whereby they must always be correct, leaders who subscribe to this toxic type of leadership are overconfident and extremely judgmental toward those who would challenge their authority.
  
I have learned that it is impossible to reason, discuss or correct an individual of this caliper. The best thing to do is keep your distance and limit contact. When contact is inevitable, limit it to the situation at hand and utilize only fact-based answers with supporting documentation. Keep opinions to ones self and avoid discussion contentious issues not relevant to the topic at hand.

Another situation of frame blindness is “groupthink”. Groupthink is another toxic situation, whereby the practice of thinking or making decisions as a group in a way that discourages creativity or individual responsibility. There’s always a danger of groupthink when two leaders are so alike.

My experience of groupthink can be attributed to addressing a problem or situation that has been allowed to exist prior to my affiliation with the organization. The organization was regulatory not in compliance and my addressing of the situation including the fact based data showing the discrepancy could possibly mean that years of collected data might be inaccurate. Groupthink came to full circle, protecting the sanctity of the established by successfully shooting the messenger and desecrating the message.
What would have helped if I knew that my supervisor had my back (he did not,) and that I could count on him for support in the meeting that I announced the discrepancy and proposed corrective action. Unfortunately there are times you must stand your ground… alone and do your due diligence, other wise you become one of the mindless sheep and quite possible culpable in not addressing an issue that may have safety, financial or proprietary concerns at stake.     

The third and final method of frame blindness is “that’s the way we have always done it”. Never in my life have I witnessed so narrow-mindedness as individuals or groups that refuse to change or improve with the times. In my opinion it is attributed to mostly laziness, that if could be convinced without conflict might see the new method could be a vast improvement and actually create an easier and more enjoyable working experience.

My experience with this is you must slowly introduce changes utilizing a timeline of milestone to gauge successful deployment of a change to a policy, regulation, or program. That in the end could have been implemented quickly and completely, possibly saving time, money and conflict.

Reference:

Hoch, S., Kunreuther, H., & Gunther, R. (2001). Wharton on Making decisionsdoi:www.wiley.com


No comments:

Post a Comment